Cardiologia para todos

viernes, mayo 29, 2015

Clozapine-induced myocarditis, a widely overlooked adverse reaction

Clozapine-induced myocarditis, a widely overlooked adverse reaction. Ronaldson KJ , Fitzgerald PB, McNeil JJ.

Abstract We review the published cases of clozapine-induced myocarditis and describe reasons for the higher incidence in Australia (>1%) than elsewhere (<0.1%).

Medline was searched to September 2014 using 'clozapine' as the sole term.

A total of around 250 cases of clozapine-induced myocarditis have been published. Fever among patients commencing clozapine has been reported internationally, and very few of these cases were investigated for myocarditis. The time to onset of fever is consistent with its being part of a prodrome of undiagnosed myocarditis, and the risk factors are similar to those for myocarditis. In more severe cases, clozapine is discontinued, avoiding fatalities which may occur with myocarditis. Furthermore, cases of sudden death and respiratory illness may well have been undiagnosed myocarditis. The diagnosis of myocarditis is confounded by the non-specific nature of the signs and symptoms, and it depends on appropriate investigations being conducted at the time of myocardial involvement or, for fatal cases, the affected area of the myocardium being sampled for histology.

It is likely that the incidence of myocarditis is around 3%. Implementation of monitoring procedures will increase case ascertainment and result in more patients benefiting from this valuable medication.

jueves, mayo 28, 2015

Efficacy and Safety of Ultrafiltration in Decompensated Heart Failure Patients With Renal Insufficiency

Efficacy and Safety of Ultrafiltration in Decompensated Heart Failure Patients With Renal Insufficiency; Cheng Z, Wang L, Gu Y, Hu S; International Heart Journal (Apr 2015)

Ultrafiltration (UF) is an alternative strategy to diuretic therapy for the treatment of patients with decompensated heart failure. The impact of UF in decompensated heart failure with renal insufficiency remains unclear. A literature search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of UF in decompensated heart failure patients with renal insufficiency.Seven RCTs with 569 participants were eligible for analysis. There was significantly more 48 hour weight loss (WMD 1.59, 95% CI 0.32 to 2.86; P = 0.01; I2 = 68%) and 48 hour fluid removal (WMD 1.23, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.82; P<0.0001; I2 = 43%) in the UF group compared to the control group. Serum creatinine (WMD 0.05; 95% CI -0.23 to 0.33; P = 0.61; I2 = 77%) and serum creatinine changes (WMD 0.05; 95% CI -0.15 to 0.26; P = 0.61; I2 = 77%) were similar between the UF and control groups. All-cause mortality (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.55; P = 0.83; I2 = 0.0%) and all-cause rehospitalization (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.92; P = 0.94; I2 = 52%) were also similar between the UF and control groups. Adverse events such as infection, anemia, hemorrhage, worsening heart failure, and other cardiac disorders did not differ significantly between the UF and control groups.UF is an effective and safe therapeutic strategy and produces greater weight loss and fluid removal without affecting renal function, mortality, or rehospitalization in patients with decompensated heart failure complicated by renal insufficiency.

sábado, mayo 23, 2015

Asociación entre hipertension enmascarada y disfuncion cognitiva

NEW YORK CITY, NY — Middle-aged and older individuals with masked hypertension may be at risk for cognitive decline, or vice versa, suggests

[1]

new research .

A study of more than 500 Japanese adults, ambulatory and living independently (and without a clinical diagnosis of dementia), showed that those with masked hypertension were more than twice as likely to have cognitive dysfunction, as measured on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), as those with controlled hypertension.

The findings were presented here at the American Society of Hypertension (ASH) 2015 Annual Scientific Meeting. Coinvestigator Dr Yuichiro Yano (Northwestern University, Chicago, IL) told heartwire from Medscape that the study's take-away message for clinicians is that ambulatory blood-pressure (BP) measures "can reveal the hidden risk of cognitive dysfunction" in this patient population.

In addition, Yano noted that because the CV risks associated with masked hypertension (such as target organ damage and stroke) have been reported regardless of race/ethnicity, "we expect that our results may be generalizable to other race/ethnic groups." However, he added that replication in different cohorts is warranted.

Test for Identifying At-Risk Patients

A total of 587 hypertensive patients 40 years of age or older (58% women; mean age 72.9 years) were enrolled in the study.

Office and 24-hour BP monitoring occurred for all participants and showed that 15.8% had masked hypertension (office BP <140/90 mm Hg, 24-hour BP >130/80 mm Hg). In addition, 21.7% had white-coat hypertension (>140/90 and <130/80, respectively), 46.3% had sustained hypertension (>140/90 and >130/80, respectively), and the remaining 16.3% were considered to have well-controlled BP (<140/90 and <130/80, respectively).

Participants with the lowest quartile scores on the MMSE (mean 24 points) were considered to have cognitive dysfunction (n=183).

The lowest adjusted mean MMSE scores were found in the masked-hypertension group, followed by the sustained hypertension group. The odds ratio for cognitive dysfunction in those with masked hypertension was 2.4 (95% CI 1.1–5.0) vs the controlled hypertension group (P=0.03). In addition, multiple regression models showed that this association held even after adjustment for age, sex, current smoking or daily drinking, body-mass index (BMI), diabetes status, preexisting CVD, or use of any antihypertensive drug.

The investigators note in the abstract that the findings suggest that a simple cognitive function test "may be useful for identifying older hypertensive patients at risk for high BP outside the office."

First-of-Its-Kind Study?

"I'm really interested to see these findings and was not aware of a previous study like this," the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Dr Barbara Bowman (Atlanta, GA), told heartwire .

"We're getting increasingly interested in masked and white-coat hypertension in the US. So it was really intriguing to me to see the differences the investigators seemed to find in the Mini-Mental State Exam scores between the groups," commented Bowman, who was not involved with the research.

She said she was also impressed "that it was a pretty good-sized study" to be looking into these issues in relatively healthy individuals. "So this [finding for masked hypertension] might be a sign of functional decline to come."

Dr William Haley (Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL) agreed but pointed out that the MMSE "is not terribly detailed" and wished that the investigators had used a different, "more reliable measure of cognitive decline." Still, "it's an interesting take," he said, adding that, like Bowman, he didn't know of any other studies assessing these associations with cognitive dysfunction.

However, he reported that in an ancillary study of the SPRINT trial, which he is part of and that is assessing effect of hypertension management on nighttime blood pressure, cognitive decline is being measured "with a variety of quite extensive panels of testing."

"I think we'll have a much better bead on this [association between masked hypertension and cognitive dysfunction] when we get our data out of the SPRINT trial," which is scheduled to wrap next summer, said Haley.

Statins ligadas a diabetes y complicaciones en población saludable

Statin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease among healthy adults has been linked to an increased risk for diabetes, diabetes complications, and overweight/obesity in a new retrospective cohort study that tracked individuals in a database for an average of 6.5 years.

"Whereas the increased risk of diabetes with statins is well-known, the increased risk of diabetic complications has not been previously described," write the authors, led by Ishak Mansi, MD, from the department of medicine, Veterans Affairs (VA) North Texas Health System, Dallas.

They report their findings in the Journal of General Internal Medicine and note that these are among the first data to show a connection between statins and diabetes in a relatively healthy group of people.

"The risk of diabetes with statins has been known, but until now it was thought that this might be due to the fact that people who were prescribed statins had greater medical risks to begin with," said Dr Mansi in a VA statement.

But this current work cannot be used to determine this risk/benefit because of missing information relating to various cardiovascular parameters, he and his colleagues say. Hence further research —including randomized controlled studies for prolonged periods and larger-scale prospective studies — are needed to develop a more complete risk/benefit assessment of statin treatment for primary prevention, they stress.

Asked to comment, Alvin C Powers, MD, director, division of diabetes, endocrinology and metabolism, at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, said: "I think the risk/benefit ratio in people with diabetes and statins remains the same as it was before, and the recommendations per the American Diabetes Association still are relevant."

"[The study] confirmed [an] increased risk for diabetes, and in this case, there were more complications of diabetes in the group taking statins, but it's not clear if that is a result of the statins or just the patient population," he told Medscape Medical News.

However, the author of another recent study, which reported the largest risk yet seen for diabetes with statins, Markku Laakso, MD, from the University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University, has urged caution when considering statin use in primary prevention.

"Statins are not meant to be a treatment for everybody. Especially in women, who are at a lower risk of getting cardiovascular disease, maybe we should be more careful when we start statin treatment?" he said in March, when his work was published.

Dose-Response Relationship Observed

Statin use has long been associated with increased incidence of diabetes, but doctors have always maintained that the benefits of statin use outweigh this risk, particularly in a secondary-prevention population, given the powerful effects of statins in reducing cardiovascular risk.

But data on the long-term effects of these associations in a primary-prevention population are very limited, say Dr Mansi and colleagues. And the relationship between statin use and diabetic complications has not been adequately studied in such individuals, they note.

They identified Tricare beneficiaries who were evaluated between October 1, 2003 and March 1, 2012 and divided individuals into a group of statin users and a group of nonusers; about 75% of the statin prescriptions were for simvastatin.

The researchers excluded those who had preexisting cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or any life-limiting chronic diseases at baseline and used 42 baseline characteristics to generate a propensity score to match statin users and nonusers.

Of a total of 25,970 healthy adults at baseline, the researchers' propensity score matched 3351 statin users and 3351 nonusers.

The overall proportion of patients who developed diabetes during the follow-up period was approximately 14%, which is similar to recent national trends, the researchers say.

After adjustment for confounding factors —including the fact those who used statins had more visits with healthcare providers than nonusers — those who took statins still had an 85% higher risk of developing new-onset diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 1.85) and more than double the risk of diabetes with complications (OR, 2.53), as well as in increase in overweight/obesity (OR, 1.12) compared with those who didn't take statins.

The results also show that high-intensity statin therapy was associated with the highest risk of diabetes, diabetic complications, and overweight/obesity (adjusted ORs 2.55, 3.68, and 1.58, respectively), thereby demonstrating a dose–response relationship.

First Study to Show Risk of Diabetic Complications

Statin use was associated with a "very high risk of diabetes complications," says Dr Mansi, adding, "This was never shown before."

"Our findings will need to be confirmed by other studies, as they may have significant implications," he and his colleagues note.

"Our results indicate that extrapolating information from carefully selected patients in short-term randomized controlled studies to decades of statin use for primary prevention might not be appropriate.

"Additionally, statin effects on overall comorbidity, not only cardiovascular morbidity, need to become part of the risk/benefit assessment," they add.

Besides driving further research, Dr Mansi says he hopes the results will help inform conversations between patients and providers about the risks and benefits of statins.

"I myself am a firm believer that these medications are very valuable for patients when there are clear and strict indications for them," he said. "But knowing the risks may motivate a patient to quit smoking, rather than swallow a tablet, or to lose weight and exercise. Ideally, it is better to make those lifestyle changes and avoid taking statins if possible."

viernes, mayo 22, 2015

Stent thrombosis and dual antiplatelet therapy interruption with everolimus-eluting stents

Stent thrombosis and dual antiplatelet therapy interruption with everolimus-eluting stents

Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 05/22/2015

énéreux P, et al. –

G

The authors sought to examine the relationship between DAPT discontinuation and stent thrombosis (ST) after cobalt chromium everolimus–eluting stents. In this large pooled experience, permanent DAPT discontinuation before 30 days after cobalt chromium everolimus–eluting stent implantation was strongly associated with ST, whereas DAPT discontinuation beyond 90 days appeared safe.

Methods

Outcomes from 11219 patients were pooled from 3 randomized trials and 4 registries with 2-year follow-up period after cobalt chromium everolimus–eluting stent implantation. Rates of definite/probable ST were analyzed according to DAPT discontinuation in the following time intervals: 0 to 30, 30 to 90, 90 to 180, 180 to 365, and 365 to 730 days.

Results

Eighty-five cases of ST (0.75%) occurred in 83 patients during 2 years, with 41 (48.2%) events occurring within 30 days. The 2-year ST rate in patients interrupting DAPT at any time was similar to that in patients never interrupting DAPT through 2 years (25/4067 [0.63%] versus 58/7152 [0.83%] respectively; P=0.27]. By propensity and DAPT usage–adjusted multivariable analysis, permanent DAPT discontinuation before 30 days was independently associated with the occurrence of ST (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 26.8 [8.4–85.4]; P<0.0001), whereas permanent DAPT discontinuation in any interval after 90 days was not associated with ST. Only 2 ST events occurred after DAPT discontinuation between 30 and 90 days (both between 30 and 60 days), and the association between permanent DAPT discontinuation and ST during this period is unclear (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 8.7 [2.0–37.3]; P=0.004 for adjusted analysis and 3.4 [0.8–13.8]; P=0.07 for the unadjusted analysis).